How does the peak effect of subcutaneous morphine compare to that of intravenous injections?

Prepare for the Hospice and Palliative Nurse Certification Exam with flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Each question includes hints and explanations to enhance your study process. Get ready to excel in your exam!

The correct response highlights that subcutaneous morphine has a delayed peak effect compared to intravenous injections. This is primarily due to the differences in absorption rates between the two routes of administration.

When morphine is administered intravenously, it enters the bloodstream directly and rapidly reaches peak plasma concentrations. This results in an immediate therapeutic effect, which is particularly beneficial in acute pain management or situations where rapid onset is essential.

On the other hand, subcutaneous administration involves the drug being absorbed through the subcutaneous tissue into the bloodstream, a process that generally takes longer. This slower absorption can result in a delay in achieving peak levels of morphine in the circulation, thereby prolonging the onset of action before the maximum analgesic effect is felt by the patient.

While intravenous morphine might provide a more immediate relief, subcutaneous morphine can still be effectively used when intravenous access is challenging or not required. Understanding these pharmacokinetic differences in drug absorption and effect is crucial for effective pain management in palliative care settings.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy